The United States has entered a new phase—one of deregulatory momentum—driven by recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions and an ...

It too was a 50-year-old precedent when, thank goodness, the court overruled it in 1954 in Brown vs. Board of Education. Advertisement Or Bowers vs. Hardwick , a 1986 decision upholding Georgia ...

N ever before has the Supreme Court’s disregard for precedent, reason, the Constitution, and public sentiment been so complete that the court changes whole swaths of Constitutional Law too fast ...

State laws requiring the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms keep losing in court, but that won’t matter if they win ...

The decision deals a major blow to Mayor Andre Sayegh and his police department allies who engaged in a lengthy legal battle ...

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 term opened in ... The 2022 term provides additional opportunities for the Court to reconsider precedent, ... The decision could change the Court’s framework ...

In the 1960s, the Supreme Court Justices overturned 150 years of segregation-affirming precedents in favor of their own personal beliefs. Questions have fallen into disfavor.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard vigorous arguments over a 40-year-old precedent that has given broad power to federal agencies in how they regulate the environment, public health and safety ...

(CNN) — Anti-immigrant state officials and federal judges would have new power to dictate immigration enforcement — including whether to detain individual migrants — under a GOP bill that ...

A Precedent Overturned Reveals a Supreme Court in Crisis Separate opinions in a case show nine justices pursuing agendas far removed from the dispute at hand. April 23, 2020 ...

Supreme Court may overturn major environmental precedent this week. By Pamela King | 06/25/2024 01:29 PM EDT . Here are five things to know about the Chevron doctrine and the consequences of its ...

"We're working on changes to the Supreme Court," Warren told host Jake Tapper. ... which they argue has led to decisions that are out of step with public opinion and longstanding legal precedents.